Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |

Tritanium Avenger
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 02:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
megathron looks very meh imo what's good about it compared to other attack ships? for example the typhoon looks superior in every aspect:
typhoon has: -more than 12 effective turrets/launchers (that's huge is my math wrong?) -better cap due to less usage -more speed -smaller signature
megathron has: -better tracking -and?
I didn't do the math on PWG difference vs turret requirements but i think they're similar |

Tritanium Avenger
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 16:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
[Machariel, lvl4runner]
7x 800mm Repeating Artillery II (Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L) Small Tractor Beam II
Domination X-Large Shield Booster 2x Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Shield Boost Amplifier II Core C-Type 100MN Afterburner
3x Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer Gyrostabilizer II 3x Tracking Enhancer II
Large Projectile Burst Aerator II Large Core Defense Capacitor Safeguard I
4x Berserker II
all skills 5 no implants: DPS:1144 (1350 with drones) turret opt/falloff:4000/69000 EHP:58586 Tank:476,38 speed:201/592 sig:357
[Typhoon Fleet Odyssey, PoormanMachariel]
6x 800mm Repeating Artillery II (Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L) 2x Cruise Missile Launcher II (Caldari Navy Inferno Cruise Missile)
Domination X-Large Shield Booster 2x Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Shield Boost Amplifier II Core C-Type 100MN Afterburner
4x Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer 3x Tracking Enhancer II
Large Projectile Burst Aerator II Large Core Defense Capacitor Safeguard I
5x Berserker II (+some free cpu)
all skills 5 no implants: DPS:1046(pre-buff cruise missiles) (1303 with drones) turret opt/falloff:4000/46000 (+missiles) EHP:59568 Tank:466.12 speed:172/488 sig:336 costs 1/4 of a mach
Balanced? |

Tritanium Avenger
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 18:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Deerin wrote: You could make a very similar fit in tranquility right now with Tempest Fleet....but nobody does because of the falloff. Mach has great damage projection thanks to that falloff which makes a HUGE difference.
2 cruise launchers can help compensate damage projection, and there is still some free cpu for improvements, is the difference that huge? keep in mind there's 1bil difference in price.
Tempest Fleet has less dps, drones and cpu than a mach, the new Typhoon has not much less dps, more drones and more cpu |

Tritanium Avenger
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 20:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mina Sebiestar wrote: Mach is good because 90% of its dps is coming from guns and they are triple bonused including the most important thing dmg projection(falloff).
All of that is mounted of fast, low sig rad turning on a dime overgrown cruiser called Machariel with utility high and big drone bay for SPARE drones.
You are trying to compare that with non dmg proj. guns mentioning TWO lol launchers and drones that NEED to be used to get any "EFT" number comparison between two ships is just lol...DPS patch work of fail.
It will never EVER be in same rank seriously EFT number is one thing in game another.
Typhoon will be what it always was **** face neuts included.
Drones don't NEED to be used, i've written the dps value without them, and you can subtract another 99 dps that comes from launchers and still have a huge dps amount. The drones are just a plus along with launchers, cpu and sig radius.
I'm not sayin that the two ships are on the same level, of course not. I'm just sayin that the typhoon comes just too close of a pirate faction BS worth 1b more. Why would you choose a navy apoc or mega over it?
(You mentioned drone bay and signature, isn't typhoon better on both?)
|
|
|